Sustainable Community: June 2008 Archives
|
The report written by Bill Blackburn, a
Conference Board Senior Research Fellow, is a primer on
green products, from basic definitions to explanations of life cycles
to the basics of green marketing.
Blackburn knows from where he speaks:
The former head of environment at Baxter International, he is author of
The Sustainability Handbook,
an authoritative reference for environmental managers. Blackburn's
insights are complemented by the findings of a research panel, whose
members include Aveda, Coca-Cola, J.C. Penney, Xerox, and others.
According to Joel Makower in Two Steps Forward, the "best practices" Blackburn suggests include:
- Train and periodically update the company's design and marketing workforce, including their management, on the social and environmental issues and trends that are relevant to the company and the type of products and services it offers.
- Consider the issues and trends relevant to suppliers, wholesale customers and end consumer.
- Support two-way communications to ensure marketing reconnaissance and feedback from other key stakeholders and information sources are shared.
- Stay up to date on green product and service successes and failures of other companies, especially peers.
- Inventory current products and services to see which ones may be considered green.
- Identify potential areas where developing new green products or services might be productive; involve outside experts and/or new personnel to help stimulate the discussion.
- Periodically evaluate your progress in greening and promoting your products and services, and how well they stack up against the competition.
"There's no agreed-upon definition of how much of a company's carbon footprint it needs to offset or what's needed to offset it," states Joel Makower in Two Steps Forward.
Getting to Zero attempts to make sense of all this, laying out the boundaries, providing definitions, and recommending company approaches. Among the recommendations:
Embrace a stretching boundary. The key tension surrounding any claim of neutrality remains reconciling the absolute nature of the claim — implying zero net impact — with a practical boundary-setting process. In the spirit of the term, we recommend that companies accept that claiming neutrality implies some responsibility to consider and address broader value-chain emissions. This is not to suggest that companies accept legal responsibility for the direct emissions of others, but rather that indirect emissions be explicitly considered as part of the neutrality process.
